Hubei Shiyan Longbeiwan Hydropower Station
[]
Host party(ies) China
Methodology(ies) ACM0002 ver. 12
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 297,481
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Jun 14
Length of first crediting period. 7 years
DOE/AE ERM-CVS
Period for comments 21 Dec 11 - 19 Jan 12
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (1146 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs:
First, this project violate humman right, the immigration process are not legally and properly implemented and a lot of evidence can proove that due to the project construction, compenstation is not satisfied by the local and farmers are enforced to leave their farming land and homes without propoer implementation, project immigration office have used force and threat the locals to leave, there are evidences below:
1)"If you have capability and if you are not satisfied, then go to Beijing to sue us! wording by the Longbeiwan immigration officer" reference link at (http://blog.cnfol.com/longbeiwan/article/47359994.html) date 2011-05-02;
2)"The farmers are hurt by the longbeiwan liulin immigration process" reference link at (http://www.tianya.cn/publicforum/content/develop/1/569016.shtml) date 2011-03-02;
3)"Sorrow from the peasant of Zhushan County for Longbeiwai immigration" reference link at (http://bbs.city.tianya.cn/tianyacity/content/46/1/597325.shtml) date 2011-11-18;
4)"Inflation and price level increasing, immigration is suffered" reference link at (http://www.tencoelec.com/q257040917.html), mentioned that the executed compensation price is based on 2006 level instead of current value, date 2011-12-21;
5)"Please help us, by longbeiwan immigrants", reference link at (http://wenwen.soso.com/z/q281039804.htm), mentioned that the locals can't accept the current compenstation price level, date 2011-04-17;
6)"Blood and tears from the immigrants of Longbeiwan" reference link at (http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1254891093), date 2011-10-22;
7)"the compenstation is gone, bribery scandle maybe?" reference link at (http://www.fanfucn.com/cqzl/2011-10-12/3369.html), reported by China Anti-Bribery Network,date 2011-10-12;
as a representative of longbeiwan immigrants, we hope the CDM will bring benifits really to the locals, peasants are poor and helpless, what can they do without proper compenstation? such project is not qualified as CDM, if it is approved, where can we find the integrity of CDM and value of indealing with climate change?
please investigate before approve this project, we hope UN is a fair organization.
Submitted by: wang shouyi

Secondly, as the project desgin document said that the project started construction in 2011-02-24. dame construction agreement, but the real starting date is much earlier:
1)Zhuxi County Government Order, measures to prevent incoming immigrants to the longbeiwan project area, reference link at (http://www.zhuxi.gov.cn/wjReadNews.asp?NewsId=10792), date year of 2008;
2)Longbeiwan Project planned to start construction in 2010-09-01, reference link (http://www.geo-show.com/Join/newscontents-shiyanshi-41010.aspx), it says that by the reporter interview, the project already finished construction of the site roads and storage house and substation, year of 2010;
3)Longbeiwan project progress report in 2011-05-13, reference link (http://blog.cnfol.com/longbeiwan/article/47685301.html), it says that basical construction work have been done, and the dam already finished digging 0.2 million m3 stones, Diversion tunnel have been finished contruction with 500 m and commuting tunnel have been finished with 1000m;
4)Dam construction tendering process finished by 2011-01-07, the Sinohydro win the tendering and bidding process, which means the tender have been achieved before the 2011-01-07, and the articles also said that the project already start constuction in 2010-11-28, such news can not be ignored, reference link (http://sinohydro1502.com/bencandy.php?fid=40&id=985);
5)Tunnel construction tendering start by Longbeiwan, 2010-07-25, the longbeiwan project developer try to start looking for the constructor for the tunneling system, this is the proove of the intention to start construction, however, the CDM prior consideration is not done at that time, reference link(http://www.fcbdl.com/bencandy.php?fid=29&id=1947);
6)Tunnel consturciton tendering process finished by 2010-08-19, the Sinohydro win the tendering and bidding process, which means the tunnel contract have been enclose by then, because tendering process will implement template contract regulated by the state administration, reference link (http://www.fcbdl.com/bencandy.php?fid=3&id=1988);
7)Progress report by Sinohydro, 2011-09-09, it also mentioned by Sinohydro once again the project stared at 2010-11-28, reference link:(http://www.sinohydro1502.com/bencandy.php?fid=60&id=1302);
8)the construction start ceremoney, reference link (http://www.njrdgx.com/shownews.asp?id=253) much more earlier than 2011-02-24 where the project said in PDD;
9)the cement and sand roller system and concrete construction system tendering notice, 2010-09-10, by the longbeiwan project, reference link(http://www.tianya.cn/techforum/content/242/259515.shtml);
10) Dam construction signing at 2010-12-24,reported by the longbeiwan mother company and sinohydro, reference link(http://www.xiaolangdi.com.cn/2010/1227/6214.html);

a lot of evidences shows the project did not consider CDM at all, before the project construction, please investigate the truth.

we suggest the UNFCC CDM EB to check ERM, because ERM as the third party independent validator, in previous projects especially large hydros in Yunnan, Sujiahe Hydropower, they have lied many times that they have investigated the CDM earlier consideration issue. facing so many evidences, however, they wrote that they have investigated that the evidence and the starting date is still what the PDD says. 
Submitted by: wang shouyi


The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs