PP and consultant do not read or understand the methodology, guidance and tools is evident from the benchmark. Which guidance, tool allows interest rate increased by inflation rate as benchmark? Does Gordon model is based on Dividend Yield of Index?  Does Gordon model use GDP Industrial growth rate? Does the model or any text book or research article state that Dividend yield of index plus GDP Industrial growth rate minus Bond yield is risk premium? How is the so call risk premium calculated with incorrect and absolutely wrong and misguiding manner become the risk premium of wind power project?  Whether Guidance or tool recognise CA recommended return as one of the benchmarks? Why the PP and consultant are misguiding the global stakeholders and also EB? This is absolutely a non-additional project and the PP and consultant want to make it additional somehow.
Otherwise, how can the PDD be webhosted without any input parameters and assumptions used in the financial indicator calculation? PP and consultant do not state what financial indicator has been used and how the benchmark is appropriate for the financial indicator. Even DOE has webhosted such projects though this is not the first time that this consultant has done this. 
This PDD is not transparent ; it conceals all important information and thereby incapacitated the  global stake holder from commenting.  If it is really additional then there is no reason for the consultant to hide information and DOE to accept such PDD. This project should not be taken up fro validation unless the PDD is re web hosted with all input parameters and assumptions and benchmark as recommended by guidance. If DOE takes this project for validation without re webhosting it only means that it is either unaware of the procedure or do not bother about global stakeholders comments. EB may kindly take note of this project and do not accept it for registration unless it is re-webhosted.