Renewable Energy Project by Pramatha Power Pvt. Ltd. Goa (EKIESL- CDM. April 16-04)
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) AMS-I.D. ver. 18
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 23,546
Proposed start date of PA 04 Nov 15
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Aug 16
Length of first crediting period. 7 years
DOE/AE LGAI Technological Center, S.A.
Period for comments 19 May 16 - 17 Jun 16 (23:59:59 GMT)
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation Pramatha Power Pvt. Ltd.
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (872 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs:
EKI is a company which has well known for all the wrong reasons. They are corrupt and fraud. 
1.	The start date of project seems fraud, also why is an EPC contract being considered and not the PO for Modules. DOE to check with the originals. 
2.	EKI is known in the market as not to conduct the stakeholders meeting. That’s the reason they never give any ad in public or they do not submit any photographs as they have never conducted any stakeholder meeting. Even the DOE does not go at the site as TQC is associated with EKI and EKI is the co owner of the company. Can Applus check the photos of the stakeholder meeting? 
3.	Further for LSC meeting the DNA is to be invited, if an actual meeting was carried out, that too by the CDM consultant as mentioned in the PDD, then they should be aware of the requirement. So have they invited the DNA for the stakeholder meeting. 
4.	Further if the CDM consultant was appointed before the PO, why has that not been considered as start date? 
5.	To verify how fraud the company EKI is… you may check http://www.nhpcindia.com/BannedFirmListEng.htm they are blacklisted by a PSU because of all fraud things that they do. 
6.	DOE Applus also to check its credibility as their Indian partner TQC is an holding company of EKI’s partners. Which is a big conflict of interest. This is the reason why majority of the projects by TQC is from EKI. How applus has mitigiated the risk from same company is a mystery.  

Will Applus make a through check. 
Submitted by: Naveen Dhingra


The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs