EKI is a company which is well known for all the wrong reasons. They are corrupt and fraud. The financial calculations are flawed on the below accounts;
1.	The assumptions for input parameters are not consistent as APERC tariff order is used at places which help keep the IRR value less. The assumptions shall be consistent to use APERC as well from the offer letter from the supplier as those are the values that are available with them. 
2.	The start date of project seems fraud, DOE to check with the originals. 
3.	EKI is known in the market as not to conduct the stakeholders meeting. That’s the reason they never give any ad in public or they do not submit any photographs as they have never conducted any stakeholder meeting. Even the DOE does not go at the site as TQC is associated with EKI and EKI is the co owner of the company. Can Applus check the photos of the stakeholder meeting? 
4.	The funny thing is that the person mentioned on the site by EKi was not even the employee of the company at that date. Foolish people. I am sure the DOE will help them cover all this. 
5.	To verify how fraud the company EKI is… you may check http://www.nhpcindia.com/BannedFirmListEng.htm they are blacklisted by a PSU. 
6.	Hetero Power you are devaluing your own name in the market by associating with such companies, further the DOE Applus also to check its credibility as their Indian partner TQC is an holding company of EKI’s partners. Which is a big conflict of interest. This is the reason why majority of the projects by TQC is from EKI. How applus has mitigiated the risk from same company is a mystery.
The DOE can contact me if in case they have further queries at naveenenvironment12@gmail.com  

Regards, 
Naveen 

EKI is a company which is well known for all the wrong reasons. They are corrupt and fraud. The financial calculations are flawed on the below accounts;
1.	The assumptions for input parameters are not consistent as APERC tariff order is used at places which help keep the IRR value less. The assumptions shall be consistent to use APERC as well from the offer letter from the supplier as those are the values that are available with them. 
2.	The start date of project seems fraud, DOE to check with the originals. 
3.	EKI is known in the market as not to conduct the stakeholders meeting. That’s the reason they never give any ad in public or they do not submit any photographs as they have never conducted any stakeholder meeting. Even the DOE does not go at the site as TQC is associated with EKI and EKI is the co owner of the company. Can Applus check the photos of the stakeholder meeting? 
4.	The funny thing is that the person mentioned on the site by EKi was not even the employee of the company at that date. Foolish people. I am sure the DOE will help them cover all this. 
5.	To verify how fraud the company EKI is… you may check http://www.nhpcindia.com/BannedFirmListEng.htm they are blacklisted by a PSU. 
6.	Hetero Power you are devaluing your own name in the market by associating with such companies, further the DOE Applus also to check its credibility as their Indian partner TQC is an holding company of EKI’s partners. Which is a big conflict of interest. This is the reason why majority of the projects by TQC is from EKI. How applus has mitigiated the risk from same company is a mystery.
The DOE can contact me if in case they have further queries at naveenenvironment12@gmail.com  

Regards, 
Naveen 

1. During the project visit of APPLUS team in India, Natalia have taken bribe from the PP’s and their Partner in India. APPLUS team have not spent even 10 minutes in site, it seems that they came here for the Picnic & leisure visit over LGAI funds. 
2. APPLUS have done PoA recently, they have not followed any ethical practices in the PoA at Asia. They are known to violate the norms set by the EB.
3. APPLUS have many auditor in china, all the Auditor have conflict of interest with either with Client or consultant. Why Applus is having maximum projects in China and not in other country ?
4. This EKI energy known to misuse DOE & is giving major projects to EPIC, Applus and PJR DoE in india, if APPLUS team and UNFCCC investigate  you will find that Reetesh Jain have some shareholding in those two company EPIC & PJR also.
5. This Manish Dabkara is the batchmate of Vivek Ahirwar, and this vivek ahirwar is doing projects of Manish Dabkara via TQC, and Reetesh jain is also happens to be batchmate of the both.
6. If You need any further information & documentary evidence please contact us on martin.hams1956@gmail.com 
and mobile number +91 93-25-446292.