Basic information regarding  PP is incorect as PP is into manufacturing of business and is public listed company on BSE.
How has DOE confirm that the project is equity funded and no debt part is involved , Will DOE cross check with the audited financial balance sheet of the company.
Which is the correct metering point and how come metering point be outside project boundry?
How come a EPC supplier quatotation for power sale price be taken as reference during decision making , Power tariff are decided by TNRE and not the EPC contractor , Pl check if the value considered are correct or some thing is hidden.

Please consider below comments in validation:

It is a well known fact that the wind projects are mainly installed considering CDM revenues and offsetting of tax liability of the company as a result of accelerated depreciation of 80%.

PPs cleverly do not consider the accounting tax offsetting in their companies while calculating the IRR. This is evident from the recently registered projects and those requesting registration. It is seen from the projects in pipeline that wind projects do not present the actual financials while proving additionality and hence abusing the Clean Development Mechanism.

The DOE is therefore requested to critically analyze how the accelerated depreciation benefit has been taken into account and confirm the accounting of the cash inflows as a result of the negative tax liability in the initial years. DOE should not be misguided by the financial presented by the PP or consultant which are custom made for CDM purposes and not the actual financial considered at the investment decision.

Note that considering cash inflows results in an increase in the IRR making wind projects a profitable venture.

Let me know if you have any queries/clarification.

Yours,
Babloo Singh

Submitted by: Babloo