Wind Power Project by Rajasthan Gum Private Limited (EKI.CDM.July-11-01)
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) AMS-I.D. ver. 17
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 20,373
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Dec 11
Length of first crediting period. 7 years
DOE/AE KBS Certification Services Limited
Period for comments 26 Jul 11 - 24 Aug 11
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation EKI Energy Services Limited
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (1110 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs:
Enking International, as a matter of principle, hides information on the input parameters and assumptions used. Another PDD webhosted through RINA also does not give any information. Likewise, PP also does not want to give any information. Earlier another PDD was webhosted in July 2011, where also the PP did not give nay information in the PDD. 

It is not clear how the DOE permists webhosting PDDs which do not conform to CDM requirements. This PDD does not conform to CDM requirement, because with the given information (there is no information at all) the reader cannot construct the worksheet and arrive at the same results. Since no information is given, this requirement is not fulfilled. Hiding information only proves that the project is not additional and has been made additional. Otherwise there is no reason why the PP should hide information from global stakeholders. Therefore, this project should not be taken up for validation by DOE unless the PP re webhosts the PDD with all information. If the DOE goes ahead with validation without re webhosting, it will prove that it is also not aware of the rules. EB may kindly note this project and do not accept it for registration unless it is re webhosted.
Submitted by: Karthikeyan


The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs