10 MW Biomass based Power Project by Sanjog Sugars & Eco-Power Private Limited
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) AMS-I.D. ver. 16
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 51,803
Start date of first crediting period. 31 Aug 11
Length of first crediting period. 10 years
DOE/AE LRQA Ltd
Period for comments 09 Feb 11 - 10 Mar 11
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation Sanjog Sugars & Eco -Power Private Limited
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (833 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs: 
•	Though the formula for arriving at the WACC is mentioned, PP has not transparently described the input assumptions for the same for global stakeholders to understand and comment.
•	PDD indicates that the PP planned to install a 10 MW project. Was CDM considered at that stage? Or did the PP modify the project so as to make the project a CDM feasible project? DOE is requested to critically analyse the DPR for 10 MW.
•	The assumptions for financial analysis are NOT AT ALL given in the PDD. Where’s the transparency??? How did the DOE find such a PDD to be web hosted??? PDD is of poor quality to be web-hosted for Global stakeholder consultation.
•	The basis of input parameters taken at the time of investment decision is not adequately demonstrated with justification in the section B.5 of the PDD.
•	The basis of choosing Bank PLR as benchmark for the determination of additionality is not correct. 
•	No of hours of operation should be included in the sensitivity analysis. 
•	The basis for IDC is to be validated by DOE
•	Chronology of events is not adequate. What is the status of the project implementation?
•	Leakage emissions due to transportation of biomass and ash disposal to be calculated and to then PP can prove leakage is negligible. 
•	The measurement of cotton stalk combusted in the boiler should be based on direct method. Pls clarify.
Submitted by: james smith

The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs