Renewable Wind Energy by Fortune Five Hydel Projects (P) Limited
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) ACM0002 ver. 12
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 179,474
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Jun 13
Length of first crediting period. 7 years
DOE/AE DNV-CUK
Period for comments 10 Apr 12 - 09 May 12
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation Fortune Five Hydel Projects Private Limited
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (505 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs:
Comment (137 KB) submitted by: Vijay Khangar on behalf of vijaykhangar@yahoo.com

Comment (1123 KB) submitted by: Vijay Khangar on behalf of vijaykhangar@yahoo.com

Comment (113 KB) submitted by: Vijay Khangar on behalf of vijaykhangar@yahoo.com

DOE is instructed to contact vijaykhangar@yahoo.com for further comments on the project regarding PPA, PLF, O&M reports, FInancial documents before submission to EB
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

press release copies says that PLF estimated is more than 32%. IRR is high.
Greenko group is making profits
for all upcoming projects of the group, during deal stage itself, we have evidence to prove that project is highly viable without CDM.
For more informaition pleas contact vijaykhangar@yahoo.com, mobile number is provided on request.
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

1.Is the project planning to sell power in Open access, third party?
2. Is it applying for REC benefits?
3. Will the project developer drop out in future from CDM registration, if applying for cdm?
4. "Thiru naotla gaadididhi munda" - say that project cannot be registered without DOE support.
5. DOE to review tariff, PPA
6. Consultant must not be biased
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

Comment (17 KB) submitted by: Vijay Khangar on behalf of vijaykhangar@yahoo.com - contact in future for avoiding fake projects

PLF at what confidence considered
bankers ask for P 50, P 75 - pls consider the same
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

a. calculations of CER has to be re checked
b. Sustainability issues are not clearly explained
c. How can a project claim CDM benefits, if it is applying for REC and GBI
d. Rjauu is always kalakarudu - means how many local people are emloyed and benefited during construction and after construction and aafter succesfl operaation and maintenance.
How many people for design are local people?
Explain their salary structures?
Pls ink their salaies to the number of CERs


Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

Please provide UTM, UIM, LTM and geographic coordinates of all machines, as lot of WTG are coming in the same location
Forest land approval for some of the machines is obtained? 
return back agricultural land  to farmers
in india donot entertain the conversion of agricultural land to private land. is the project did convert any land?

Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

the nearesst airport distance is wrong. Rjaau to measure with scale and enter the correct value.

same is case to railway statn distance, measure and enter.\
why PP going for renewal of credit period. do PP have any problem with fixed CP. Life of the project given as 20 Years. Pls change it to fixed credit period. Financiaal and other analysis for 20 years only. now apply for renewal?..Rjau....keka..revise the CP interval.

project cost to revise.
DPR cost is high as the DPR party is very close to  PP.
wwho will carry the O&M for 20 years of project cycle. if O&M change, then PP will forgo cdm benefits?
revise MAT Value.
PLF of P 50 to be considered, EB has to clearly approve for the PLF considered on P vales by PP.
Banks ask for P50, 75 only. revise PLF.
It is very common practise in India for Wind projects. Tariff has to be checked, as the tariff is being escalated every year.
benchmark, emission factor values revise.
Consultant, not favor PP.
Monitorng plan to be revised.
Who's is going to head local office. appoint a local person and employ 95% local people in plant operation and design.
PPA to be disclosed. what is shown to Bankers and financial institutes, ILFS to be enquired and also banks. Project apprisal note from bankrs to be studied from point to point, word to word. PPA is high for all WTGs.

if the cod of project of not happen on time, is company forgo REC, cdm?
when is PP applying for REC. when will the decision made.
agreement for PPA when is expected?
Upload PPA, when it is made on UNFCCC project webpage.

I spent 4 mandays in drafting comments - for details reach me on my mail.

Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

b.7.1. team periodically meet to review cdm - specify frequency, upload minutes on FFHPL website, minutes to be authorized by MD. In a month how many checks or review will happen, who will authorize the same above.
SLD to be uploaded.
Is the plant installing ABT meterr? then PP is applying for REC.
How the scheduling of power is made to excanges, power traders?
internal audits should be carried our every 3 months. as the project is large scale, halfyearly  not accepted. reports are authorized by board of directoers.
seriousness in project is not seen. offer from various partes is received more before the contract signing date.
check the date from the emails from the concerned contractors. contact GE-US for more details.
financial closure date and amount is not clear.
Project is not allotted for 128 MW.
The project participant had invited local stakeholders for a meeting by way of affixing a notification at 
Grampanchayat office on 12.01.2012 by giving week days time for submission of their suggestions / 
comments on the project activity and conducted stakeholders meeting at Hotel Vimochan, Basavana 
Bagewadi Taluq, Bijapur District, Karnataka on 20.01.2012 at 11.30 a.m - is week days time sufficient. atleast 15 - 3 days notice required. as dring that time most of the village oficials aare not in station.

re conduct and re webhost the PDD.



 
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

what is CER price considered dring investment analysis time>
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar


The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs