SSL Wind Power Project
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) AMS-I.D. ver. 13
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 28,923
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Jun 09
Length of first crediting period. 10 years
DOE/AE TUEV-RHEIN
Period for comments 12 Mar 09 - 10 Apr 09
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (1239 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs:
CDM consideration is very weak in this project. It is rather surprising to note that a project of this size 15 MW with 12 WTG's of 1.2 MW is taken up and the PDD comes up after 3 years of the start date of the Project. Hence in my assessment CDM consideration is weak and seems to be an after thought. DOE and validating agency need to verify and make sure that PP justifies the delay as regards to CDM consideration.
Submitted by: A.R.Ravi Kumar

The PP does not give the justification for delay in CDM consideration by means of chronology of events. The starting date of the proejct has not been mentioned in the PDD. Further, in the PDD, it has been mentioned that during first year of operation 2007-08, the PLF achieved is about 13%. Hence there is no justification to assume during the entire proejct period a PLF of 2.572% even though the PP has observed much lower PLF. This needs a scientific approach and proper correction.
Submitted by: A.R.Ravi Kumar

HOW PROJECT PROPONENT HAS CONSIDERED THE INCOME TAX REABATE/BENEFIT OF 100 % PROVIDED BY THE GOVT OF INDIA ,   IN IRR CALCULATION  .
FURTHER HOW THE BENEFIT OF CDM REVENUE WILL BE SHARED WITH STATE ELECTRCITY BOARD WHO IS BUYERR OF GENERATION. DOE IS ALSO REQUESTED TO 
CLARIFY ABOVE POINTS IS COMMENTS.   

S.K.GUPTA
154-F, GHANDHI DHAM , NEAR BUS STAND JAGADHRI-135003
MOBILE 9810467564 
Submitted by: S.K.GUPTA


The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs