Electricity Generation through Wind Power by SRHHL
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) AMS-I.D. ver. 16
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 11,122
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Sep 11
Length of first crediting period. 10 years
DOE/AE TÜV NORD CERT GmbH
Period for comments 26 Jan 11 - 24 Feb 11
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Limited
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (451 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs: 
 	Non- debundling nature of the project activity is not adequately justified as per EB54 Annex 13 (Debundling tool). Refer A.4.5
 	Why has option A (Combined margin) been chosen for calculating emission factor is not justified. Refer B.6
 	The justification of choosing IRR as financial indicator is not adequately justified. Whether it is equity or project IRR, pre-tax or post tax is not mentioned in the PDD. 
 	All the issues of investment analysis guidelines are not discussed in the PDD. Refer B.5. 
 	Justification of parameters including O&M, insurance, loan, derating, escalation, and tariff are not demonstrated with justification. Refer B.5.
 	Please provide a proof for proposed debt to equity taken at the investment decision. Refer B.5 
 	O&M charges and its escalation is not as per TNERC norms 
 	IT rate assumed is not as per standard practice. 
 	CER revenue assumed is not consistently applied 
 	Project cost is not as per TNERC norms
 	PP not discussing about PLF and what value taken for calculation not provided in the PDD.
Submitted by: mathew

The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs