20 MW Biomass based Power Plant of M/s. SHALIVAHANA GREEN ENERGY LIMITED
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) ACM0018
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 89,331
Start date of first crediting period. 01 Apr 11
Length of first crediting period. 10 years
DOE/AE DNV-CUK
Period for comments 27 Oct 10 - 25 Nov 10
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation Shalivahana Green Energy Limited.
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (615 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs:
Comment (12 KB) Submitted by: Vijay K. Mediratta

Comment (16 KB) submitted by: Vijay Khangar on behalf of Vijay K

Comment (15 KB) Submitted by: Vijay K. Mediratta

WWF Denmark finds the PPD insufficient for validation of the project due to lack of documentation in a number of areas. First and foremost, the demonstration of additionally by use of barriers is undocumented and not comprehensive. Secondly, the assessment of the contribution to sustainable development including the approval of the host country is unclear.

Moreover, WWF Denmark finds that the specific location of the project in a vulnerable natural resource area calls for special attention to environmental impacts. In addition to this, the stakeholder consultation has not included people directly impacted by the project or local NGO’s that could have identified negative local impacts. The project therefore has not met a key validation requirement – consultation with affected stakeholders.

Sustainable development criteria

According to the PDD, the project satisfies national sustainable development criteria for small CDM projects in India. There is, however, no documentation for this statement. The letter from the DNA does not refer to any compliance with sustainable development criteria and is thus not sufficient documentation.

The PDD should include a short description of the screening and the applied criteria should be included as an annex to the PDD.

In addition, it should be documented that the resources used for electricity production are in fact waste that is presently left over and that the use in the project is not competing with other waste uses in the local community.

Environmental Impact Assessment

The Sabah region is a vulnerable natural resource area where biodiversity is already under environmental pressure. WWF finds that an EIA should have been carried out in order to ensure that that project does not introduce additional negative impacts.

At the very least, a screening according to international EIA methodologies should have been carried out in order to justify the lack of a full EIA. This is even more appropriate since the public consultation process has not involved people directly affected by the project or local NGO’s that could have identified possible environmental impacts.

Public consultation

The public consultation process has only involved authorities and government agencies. Ensuring appropriate and adequate stakeholder consultation is key to ensuring that the projects bring real sustainability benefits. Local policy makers, local people directly impacted by the project and local NGO’s should be involved. In addition, local public participation is important in the screening of possible negative environmental impacts from projects.
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

financials submitted to bankers are on 20 MW or 23 MW?
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar

Comment (40 KB) submitted by: Justin on behalf of justin

as per MNRE standards we are supposed to use 62 ata boiler pressure as minimum. Th project meets the standards of MNRE, and all the projects in India above 15 MW are using the same technology, the project is not technically additional.
Submitted by: Vijay Khangar


The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs