The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied;
Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received;
Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party;
The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures;
The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board;
Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP;
The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board. |
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development;
In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document;
The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available;
After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated;
The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board;
The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received. |
1) The DOE is requested to clarify how it validated the calculation of the grid emission factor to be in accordance with the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” version 2.2.1. According to the tool, if IPCC default values are used for the CO2 emission factor of fossil fuels, the lower limit of the uncertainty at a 95% confidence interval, should be applied (page 23). However, in the spreadsheet submitted for grid emission factor calculation, it is observed that default values are being used instead of the values at 95% confidence interval. For example, the PP has used the CO2 emission factor for gas/diesel oil as 74,100 kg/TJ (Appendix 3, worksheet 'OM 2006', cell M22), whereas the IPCC provides a values of 72,600 kg/TJ at 95% confidence interval (2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, page 23). Please refer to VVM 1.2 paragraph 174 (b).
|
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: