02:50 01 Sep 24
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 3377 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Yunnan Maguan Tongguo Hydropower Station |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. Further clarification is sought if the FSR referred to has been prepared only for the project activity or for both the project activity and Yunnan Maguan Huabazi Hydropower Station, as the appendix 1 refers to the PP initially proposing one combined 46 MW project activity. The DOE should validate the input values in line with para. 112 of the VVM 1.1. 2. The DOE is requested to substantiate the suitability of input values used in the investment analysis in line with the paragraph 113(a) of VVM 1.1 and how it has validated the distribution of the investment costs between the project activity and that for Yunnan Maguan Huabazi Hydropower Station. 3. The DOE is requested to clarify the inconsistency in the IRR: (a) in the sheets “cost and income” and “investment plan” in the investment analysis spreadsheet; and (b) between the spreadsheet and the PDD and Validation Report. The DOE is requested to submit the spreadsheet with all formulae and cells readable as per the investment analysis guidance, EB 51, Annex 58, para 8. 4. The DOE is requested to further explain how the proposed tariff has been determined for the project activity. 5. The DOE is requested to clarify the differences between the project activity and those listed in the common practice analysis and clarify the reasons why the project activity has received a lower tariff, has higher investment costs and lower operational hours than the other similar projects. 6. Further clarification is sought on how the DOE considers the accounting of grid import as acceptable as the PDD, p38 states that the import by Yunnan Maguan Huabazi Hydropower Station will be assumed as import by the project activity. |
|
Date | 05 Jul 10 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: