18:47 18 May 25
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 3366 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Waste Heat Recovery and Utilisation for Power Generation Project of Xing’an Conch Cement Company Limited |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of the input values to the investment analysis in line with the paragraph 113 (c) of VVM v1.2., in particular: (i) total investment given that it is not clear whether the specific investment in Best Available Techniques in the Cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries document represents the specific investment of similar projects in the cement sector; and (ii) whether any preferential policies exists for waste heat based projects in the host country. 2. The DOE should further substantiate the elimination of baseline alternative P7 (waste energy based captive electricity generation with lower efficiency than the project activity), in particular, how it has validated that either P7: (i) has prohibitive barriers; or (ii) is clearly economically unattractive as per step 3 of Identification of the baseline scenario of ACM0012 v3.2. 3. The DOE should further substantiate means of validation of fcap in line with ACM0012 v3.2 and paragraph 89-92 of VVM v1.2, in particular: (i) why fcap has not been calculated for each clinker production line (how it has validated that the both new and existing clinker production lines have same waste heat); (ii) how QOE,BL and QOE,y have been validated. For both existing and new clinker production lines, the DOE shall provide information on: (i) the quantity and energy content of the waste energy produced for the rated plant capacity/per unit of product produced; (ii) use of the waste heat to meet the internal energy demand of the clinker production lines; (iii) current practice in cement industry of using the waste heat to meet internal energy demand; (iv) total energy demand of the industrial facility; (v) specific energy consumption of the clinker production. 4. The DOE should substantiate why monitoring plan does not include the monitoring of: (i) the electricity import from the grid (ECPJ,import i,y); and (ii) additional electricity consumed in year y for other equipment of the system consumption as a result of the implementation of the project activity (ECPJ,,y) as required by ACM0012 v3.2. |
|
Date | 20 Jan 11 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: