11:41 30 Sep 23
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 3328 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Wugang Waste Gas Recovery and Power Generation Project |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE is requested to further substantiate the inconsistencies among different dates of validation process and PDD versions in the PDD and the validation report. 2. Further clarification is required on how the DOE has validated the suitability of: (a) “Cost of Materials” considered in the investment analysis, in particular, the costs for Blast furnace gas (BFG) and Coke-oven gas (COG) as the baseline scenario represents “release of these waste gases to the atmosphere after incineration”, (b) steam price, and (c) project O&M costs, in line with the requirements of VVM, v1.1, para 111(c). 3. The DOE is requested to substantiate how it has validated the sensitivity analysis, in line with the requirements of VVM, v1.1. para 109(e), taking into account that the supplied IRR and sensitivity analysis spreadsheet does not contain all the formulas and there is no validation opinion on the sensitivity analysis. 4. The DOE is requested to substantiate how it has validated that project boundary and baseline emission sources are in accordance with the requirements of applied methodology. 5. The DOE is requested to justify that elimination of the scenarios P2, P4, H2, H8, H9 is in accordance with the methodology applied and clarify the exclusion of scenarios W5 and W6 taking into account that many of the scenarios are eliminated as economically unfeasible as per step 1 of ACM0012, while exclusion of baseline options at step 1 is prescribed either if the option does not comply with legal and regulatory requirements or if the option depend on fuels that are not available at the project site, and, exclusion of individual baselines options at step 3 of ACM0012 is required to be done either by barrier analysis or economical unattractiveness. 6. The DOE is requested to substantiate how it has validated the Wugang internal grid emission factor. 7. The DOE is requested to substantiate how it has validated that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the requirements of applied monitoring methodology, in particular, regard the monitoring of both generated and delivered electricity. |
|
Date | 22 Nov 10 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: