CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	2587
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Tangshan Jidong Cement Matoushan Matishan 25MW Cement Waste heat Recovery Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1. The DOE shall further clarify on the suitability of the WACC as an appropriate benchmark for the project IRR in accordance with the paragraph 13 of the Guidance on the Assessment of Investment Analysis version 2.1, in particular, application of WACC for similar projects with similar risks, developed by the same company. 2. The DOE shall further substantiate: (i) the suitability of the input values to the investment analysis in line with the paragraph 111 (c) of VVM, in particular, total investment, annual O&M cost, and annual operational hours; and (ii) why demand/capacity charge, if it would have been paid in the absence of the project activity by the project participant, has not been considered as savings in the investment analysis. 3. The PP/DOE shall further clarify the existence of the investment barriers to the project activity in accordance with Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality version 5.2. 4. The DOE shall justify whether the project activity consumes the waste heat from an existing cement facility or a new cement facility in line with ACM0012 version 03.1. Further the DOE shall substantiate whether there are more than two clinker production lines at the cement production facility, if so, what the use of waste heat generated by other clinker production lines is. 5. The PP/DOE shall further substantiate that the waste heat utilized in the project activity would be released into the atmosphere in the absence of the project activity in line with the ACM0012 v3.1. 6. The DOE shall further clarify how the means of calculation of fcap is in line with the ACM0012 v3.1, in particular, use of data of another similar clinker production line (Sanyou 1) to calculate the theoretical recoverable energy.
Date	24 Sep 09