CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	2383
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Jiangsu Wangting Natural Gas Based Power Generation Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1. Further clarification is requested from the DOE on how it has validated that the input values used in the levelized cost of electricity production (in particular the unit investment cost, discount rate, annual operation hour, fuel consumption, fuel price, etc) and investment analysis (in particular the investment cost, NG price, electricity tariff, etc) are appropriate in the project context taking note of the guidance provided in EB 38 paragraph 54. In doing so, the DOE shall document the sources of all the input values and confirm their consistent and conservative application between various documents. 2. Further clarification is requested from the DOE on how it has validated that continuing and real actions were taken to secure CDM status in parallel with its implementation, in accordance with EB41 (Annex 46, paragraph 5). 3. Further clarification is requested from the DOE on how they have validated that: (a) the other alternatives for power generation/supply (from simple cycle NG gas/ steam turbine, hydropower and import from the grid) are not plausible baseline alternatives; and (b) the energy generated in the project activity will only be used for peak load regulation throughout the crediting period. In doing so, the DOE shall provide appropriate justification supported with credible evidence. 4. Further clarification is required from the DOE on how it has validated that the baseline emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions (EFBL,upstream,CH4) and energy efficiency of the technology in the baseline have been calculated and in line with the methodology.
Date	30 Apr 09