CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	8705
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Los Pocitos Landfill Gas Utilization Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1) The compliance of the proposed project activity with the applicability condition of the methodology is demonstrated by stating that “The project activity does not affect the operation of the landfill (waste that would be recycled) in comparison with the scenario in the absence of the project.”   The PDD states  that for even composting ( the least expensive of these alternatives) to be  economically viable, the waste management company must receive USD 20 - 40 per tonne of waste, (Source: International Source Book on Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs) for Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM), UNEP).  However details have not been provided for what would have happened in the absence of the project activity. The Validation report states that the baseline alternatives LFG3, LFG4 and LFG5 are eliminated by stating “Scenarios LFG 3, LFG 4 and LFG 5, are not plausible scenarios due to high cost of implementation each of these alternatives (recycling, aerobic treatment and incineration)”.  Details/sources on how the DOE has validated the elimination has not been provided.  It is not clear how :  i) the DOE has validated the compliance with the applied methodology ACM0001,Version 12 in particular, that the methodology is only eligible if the implementation of the project activity "do not reduce the amount of organic waste that would be recycled in the absence of the project activity", in accordance with VVM version 01.2 paragraphs 71. ii) the DOE has validated the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity, in particular, what would have happened to the waste in the baseline, in accordance with VVM version 01.2 paragraph 84. Please refer to VVM version 1.2 paragraphs 71,the DOE shall determine whether the project activity meets each of the applicability conditions of the approved methodology or any tool or other methodology component referred to therein. Please refer to VVM version 01.2 paragraphs 71..
Date	23 Mar 13