13:20 01 Sep 24
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 3008 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Nanjing Jinling Grid Connected Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant Project |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of the start date of the project activity as per the ‘Glossary of CDM terms’, given that several contracts have been signed before the stated start date. 2. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of the input values applied in the calculation of the levelised cost of electricity production of each plausible alternative and IRR analysis in line with paragraph 109 of VVM. In doing so, the DOE shall confirm why sensitivity analysis is not conducted on all other parameters of the levelised cost of electricity production such as annual operation hour and electricity tariff. 3. Further clarifications are requested from the DOE on the applicability of the methodology, in particular that the implementation of the project activity will not limit natural gas (NG) based power capacity additions in region and that there is no diversion of NG from other projects in the region. 4. Further clarification is required from the DOE how it has validated: (a) energy efficiency of the technology in the baseline (nBL); (b) that applied value of emission factor of NG is consistent between PDD and the spread sheets; and (c) leakage, in particular baseline emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions (EFBL,upstream,CH4) to be in line with AM0029, version 3. |
|
Date | 17 Feb 10 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: