01:47 26 Apr 25
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 2507 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Waste Heat Recovery based Captive Power Project of Adhunik Metaliks Limited |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE shall ensure that the project description clearly states the differences resulting from the project activity compared to the pre-project situation in compliance with paragraphs 59 and 64 of VVM, in particular, (a) whether the project activity involves use of existing boilers, turbines and generators to generate electricity, and (b) whether integrated iron and steel plant of AML is an existing plant or new construction together with the project activity. 2. The DOE is requested to further justify why coal fired boilers are not included in the project boundary. 3. The DOE is requested to further substantiate: (a) how 36.1 MW (CFBC: 25.4 MW + WHRB: 10.7 MW) power can be generated in the project scenario with 34 MW steam turbines, and (b) the appropriateness of economic comparison, in particular, how the unit cost of electricity from a 55 MW coal based power plant can be compared with that of the project activity (36.1 MW). 4. The PP/DOE are requested to clarify: (a) why electricity imports from the grid in the project activity is significantly higher (196,364 MWh/annum) compared to that in the baseline scenario (41,958 MWh/annum), and (b) why electricity imports from the grid has not been kept equal in both project activity and baseline scenario. 5. The DOE is requested to further substantiate the suitability of input values to economic comparison, in particular, (a) the total project cost, and (b) the annual interest. 6. The means of calculation of QBL,product is not in accordance with ACM0012 version 2. The DOE should have raised a Corrective Action Request to require the project participant to apply ACM0012 version 3.1 or requested a deviation. As no deviation has been requested, the PP should now apply ACM0012 version 3.1 fully to this project activity. The DOE should revalidate the project applying ACM0012 version 3.1. 7. The PP/DOE are requested to further substantiate the applicability of the ACM0012 version 02 to the project activity, in particular, what would happen to the waste gas in the absence of the project activity. 8. The monitoring plan shall include monitoring of: (a) the enthalpy and steam flow rate of each boilers, (b) the rate of waste gas used by each units, (c) the rate of other fuels used by each boilers, (d) the electricity generated by the diesel generators set, and (e) the electricity imports from the grid. |
|
Date | 26 Jun 09 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: