CDM project activity/programme of activities issuance request review form (CDM-ISSR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Project title of the project activity or programme of activities (PoA) for which issuance is requested	Kampot Cement Waste Heat Power Generation Project (KCC-WHG) (2379)
DOE that requested for issuance and date of request	SIRIM (13 Aug 10)
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 65 of the CDM modalities and procedures, for which reason(s) you request review
Incompetence
Please indicate reasons for the request for review
i. The verification report states that monitored data for QWG,SP,y and QWG,AQC,y is incomplete from 01/06/2009 to 30/11/2009 because of the computer failure, hence data for this period was calculated based on monitored electricity output and the specific heat to power ratio of the boilers during the remainder of the monitoring period. The DOE considered it in line with the provision defined in the registered PDD as "any lost of data due to equipment failure will be reconstructed from former and subsequent series measurements up to 6 months after the equipment failed", and confirmed that the assumption taken was conservative. The DOE shall clarify how it confirmed that the assumption taken is the most conservative assumption theoretically possible as per VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a), in particular in calculating the heat to power ratio using the total heat input and electricity produced in the period (e.g. instead of an average of a daily calculated heat to power ratio). ii. The DOE is required to further clarify how it verified the design operational parameters including rated steam output, rated steam pressure and rated steam temperature of the AQC boiler and the suspension preheater (SP) boiler are in line with the registered PDD (7t/h, 1.6MPa, 340°C against 7.4t/h, 1.27MPa, 337°C for AQC boiler and 16t/h, 1.6MPa, 320°C against 15.1t/h, 1.27MPa, 336°C for SP boiler and in case changes are confirmed, explain why a request for changes in PDD has not been submitted prior to the first request for issuance as per EB48 Annex 66. iii. The verification report states that "the calibration cycle for the monitoring equipment as stated in the PDD is 3 years", however the PDD only indicates that calibration will be performed in accordance with the manufacturer's specification. The DOE shall clarify the manufacture specification verified and confirm that the equipments were calibrated accordingly, as per VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii).
Date	18 Feb 11