01:33 01 Sep 24
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 2042 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | The Rotem Amfert Negev (RAN) Natural Gas Fuel Switch Project |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The PP/DOE is requested to provide the detailed description of the entire plant in addition to that of the project and supported by the detailed and complete process-flow-diagram, explaining clearly the inputs and outputs. In doing this, the PP/DOE are also requested to provide clarifications regarding: (a) how many dryers are to be retrofitted and how many burners (include types) are to be installed; (b) what are the inputs (fuels, raw materials, etc) and outputs (products, etc) from the dryer; (c) if NG has been used in the plant prior to the project, either as a fuel or a process raw material. 2. The PP/DOE are also requested to describe how the ‘output from the dryer’ has been defined in the project context and the procedure and method to measure the ‘output from the dryer’ and confirm that the requirements of paragraph 5 of AMS-III.B. version 12 are complied with. 3. The DOE is requested to clarify how they have validated that the price differential between the HFO and the NG has been considered in the selection of the baseline scenario and that this price differential is not the main driver to implement the project activity. 4. The DOE is requested to clarify how they have validated that the quantity of HFO actually consumed in the dryer can be accurately measured/ estimated from the receipts of the HFO delivered to the site and not by actual monitoring, considering that HFO has also been used in process other than the dryer. In doing so, the DOE is requested to confirm that the monitoring procedure of HFO, diesel, NG and the output from the dryer will not lead to any uncertainty in the measurement and is in line with the requirements of paragraph 9 of AMS-III.B. version 12. |
|
Date | 15 Jan 09 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: