16:51 16 Jul 25
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 6217 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Guizhou Hongguo Coal Mine Methane Power Generation Project |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1) The DOE is requested to further substantiate the following input values to the investment analysis: a) The O&M costs of 1.6884 million RMB (969,417 RMB/MW), in particular: i) the power costs, considering that 10% auxiliary consumption has been deducted from the net electricity output, and ii) other costs of 0.3489 million RMB (8% of the total investment), as it is not clear if this cost is directly related to the project activity, and iii) the range of 310,650 RMB/MW-2,343,450 RMB/MW as it is not clear whether any of those projects compared to includes cost of CMM in the O&M costs as the project activity does not. b) The suitability of the power price of 0.4186 RMB/kWh including VAT: in particular, to clarify: i) whether the "actual tariff" of 0.394 RMB/kWh is a value including VAT or excluding VAT, ii) whether the "actual tariff" of 0.517 RMB/kWh (incl. VAT) for export to the grid includes any subsidies, and if not, how the value lower than the sales price was considered suitable as purchase price; and iii) why the respective tariffs were not applied according to the proportion of the sales to the gird (20%) and captive consumption (80%). c) Taxes (17% VAT, 25% income tax, 5% City Construction and Maintenance Tax and 3% Educational Surcharge) accounted as "cost" in the cash out flow, considering that the project "revenue" is based on the financial savings made on cost of power purchase from the grid, thus it is not clear if those are considered taxable income. In addition, the DOE is requested to clarify the assumptions made in the scenarios describing the impact of the delayed implementation and no implementation of the remaining two generator units, in particular, why the electricity output was adjusted by 10/12 to account for two less generators while the electricity output with the full implementation was based on nine generator units with three backup units. Please refer to VVM version 1.2 paragraphs 111.. |
|
Date | 20 Dec 12 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: