12:34 23 Feb 25
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 4722 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Recovery and Utilization of Associated Gas to Optimize Power Generation at PETROAMAZONAS Block 15 Facilities |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE shall further substantiate: (i) the appropriateness of benchmark applied as per paragraph 12 of “Guidelines on the assessment of investment analysis”, version 3.1 given that the identified financial indicator is Project IRR whereas the applied benchmark is equity benchmark (Capital Asset Pricing Model); (ii) correctness of the calculation of the benchmark in line with paragraph 111(d) of VVM v1.2; and (iii) suitability of risk premium and the adjustment factor (beta) of the CAPM in line with paragraph 111 (a) of VVM v1.2. Please also provide the spreadsheet of the benchmark calculation. 2. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of: (i) crude oil price given that the cost saving of the crude oil is not included in the project revenue, in particular the market price of crude oil; (ii) the assumed amount of gas available for power generation given that the gas production estimates after 2013 reduced about 50% from the level of the years 2009-2013; and (iii) the investment cost. Please refer to paragraph 111 (a) & (b) of VVM v1.2. 3. The DOE shall further substantiate the validation of identified baseline, in particular, how the DOE has justified the elimination of alternative G4, G7, G8 and P3 as per the AM0009 v4 (page 6) given that these alternatives have not been eliminated based on either prohibitive barriers or investment comparison analyses as required by the methodology and the associated gas has been partially processed to produce diesel in the pre-project scenario. 4. The DOE shall further substantiate that: (i) the project emission from consumption of electricity is in line with AM0009 v4 (page 9) given that the project emission due to the use of electricity for the associated gas recovery and transportation etc are not included; and (ii) the project emission has been calculated correctly in line with paragraph 92 (d) of VVM v1.2 given that an “Approach 1” is introduced by the project participant to calculate the electricity consumption by the gas processing equipment (validation report, page 31 & 32). |
|
Date | 02 Jul 11 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: