09:55 28 Apr 25
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 3506 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Zhangping Hongshi Cement Waste Heat Recovery Project |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE shall clarify whether any preferential policies exist for waste heat based projects in the host country as per paragraph 7 of step 2 of Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality v5.2. If so, why these policies are not applicable to the project activity. 2. The DOE shall further justify the identification of the baseline scenario and applicability of the methodology as required by 1.B (i) of step 1, identification of the baseline scenario of AM0024 v2.1 given that there is no ECEMENT data at least two years prior to the start date of the project activity (30/11/2007) as clinker production lines have been commissioned in 05/2007 and 05/2009 respectively. 3. The DOE shall further substantiate how the new clinker production line of the project activity meets of the applicability criteria of AM0024 v2.1 (applicability criteria 5c requires to demonstrate the specific fuel consumption for clinker production line prior to the project activity) given that the new clinker production line has been commissioned more than one year after the starting date of the project activity. 4. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of FB and Oclinker,,B data used to calculate the project emission as per emission reduction section of AM0024 v2.1 (which requires to use at least one year data prior to the start of operation of the project activity) given that the second clinker production line has been commissioned one month after the operational of the project activity. 5. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of emission factor of fuel used in clinker production process in line with paragraph 92 of VVM v1.2 considering that the type of fuel used in each clinker production line has not been justified. If more than one fuel type used in the clinker production process, the DOE shall substantiate the calculation of emission factor of fuel. 6. The DOE shall substantiate why monitoring plan does not include the monitoring of emission factor of electricity displaced by the project implementation as required by the monitoring methodology of AM0024 v2.1. 7. The monitoring plan shall include the monitoring of EGCP,y, NCVfuel,y (each fuel type), FP,y, EIP,y, PEy, COEFfuel,y, Oclinker, y, and EFCO2,fuel,y for each clinker production line separately as per monitoring methodology of AM0024 v2.1 |
|
Date | 18 Feb 11 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: