CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	3183
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Xinjiang Midong Tianshan Cement Co.Ltd’s 1600td Utilization Calcium Carbide for Cement Clinker Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1. The DOE needs to further explain how the input values to the investment analysis for the project activity are suitable in line with the VVM paragraph 109 in particular: (a) the CCR price, as the CCR supplier is transporting and disposing of the CCR to the landfill in the baseline; (b) higher repair cost compared to the baseline scenario; (c) higher 'other manufacture expenditure' and higher 'other management expenditure' compared to the baseline scenario. Furthermore, what expenses are covered under such expenditures; (d) higher coal and electricity consumption compared to the baseline scenario; and (e) more employees compared to the baseline scenario. 2. The DOE shall explain how it has considered the application of the baseline methodology is appropriate, as the approach to determine the relevant baseline emission factors (except the non-carbonate CaO and MgO content) have not been specified for the Greenfield projects, and the Methodology Panel (at its 40th meeting, AM_CLA_0084) did not consider the methodology is applicable to greenfield project, which is further reconciled by the Board at its 53rd meeting. 3. The DOE needs to further explain how the requirement of Option 1 to determine the sample of the non-carbonate CaO and MgO in the baseline scenario based on 12 months data has been met, as it was determined based on 11 months data only. Moreover, the DOE needs to further explain how the requirement of the sampling to be statistically significant with a maximum uncertainty range of 20% at a 95% confidence level has been met.
Date	16 Jun 10