CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	3179
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Jincheng Chengzhuang 18 MW coal mine methane power generation project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1. The DOE is requested to confirm if all applicable government subsidies have been considered, such as tax exemptions as income tax holiday, in line with VVM version 1.1 paragraph 112 c. 2. The DOE is requested to further validate the IRR input values, in particular the O&M costs in line with VVM version 1.1 paragraph 112c considering that (a) the validation report (pages 22 & 27) assumes a O&M to investment of 12.8% while the IRR spreadsheet uses 23%; (b) the validation report focuses on CMM price and payroll expenses while the equipment maintenance fee and miscellaneous costs have not been validated; and (c) the O&M costs includes grid backup fee while the project owner/participant is an independent power producer. 3. The DOE is requested to further justify the CMM price applied in the IRR calculation; providing evidence and a validation opinion as per VVM version 1.1 paragraph 112c. 4. The DOE is requested to further validate the suitability of the applied grid electricity tariff as the PPA was signed (August 2008) after the investment decision was made (March 2007) and it is not clear how the grid tariff is lower than the tariff for the coal mine. In doing so please refer to EB51 Annex 58 paragraph 6. 5. The DOE is requested to explain how it has validated the amount of CMM utilized for heating and cooking in the baseline and the amount of CMM to be utilized by the project activity in line with VVM ver. 1.1 paragraph 83. 6. The DOE is requested to justify the elimination of the baseline alternatives that are facing prohibitive barriers, in particular the CMM flaring and heat generation considering that it is not clear: (a) why flaring is considered a prohibitive barrier while many CMM projects have flare facilities, and (b) why there is no additional heat demand in the region. In doing so please refer to baseline methodology procedure, ACM0008 version 6 steps 4 and 5 (pages 7 and 8).
Date	30 Oct 10