CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	3135
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	24 MW Waste Heat Recovery for Power Generation Project at Ningxia Saima Industry Co., Ltd.
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1. The investment analysis shall be conducted using either nominal or real values as inputs, in particular, electricity tariff and annual O&M cost. 2. The DOE shall further justify the suitability of the input values to the investment analysis in line with the paragraph 111 (c) of VVM v1, in particular, total investment, assumed PLF, repayment of principal/interest, and why avoided cost due to the capacity/demand charge has not been considered as savings in the project activity, if any. Further the DOE shall clarify how the input values to the investment analysis have been considered suitable compared with similar projects in the region given that there are no similar projects as per the common practice analysis. 3. The DOE shall clarify the difference between the non slurry and other cement production processes. In doing so, the DOE shall substantiate why WHR based power plants developed in the other cement production plants have been excluded while conducting the common practice analysis in line with paragraphs 118 and 119 of VVM v1. 4. The DOE shall justify how it is considered that the continue venting and electricity import from the grid is the most economically attractive alternative as per step 3 of AM0024 v2.1. 5. The PP and the DOE shall further substantiate the availability of the waste heat to the project activity in line with AM0024 v2.1. For both the baseline and the project activity, the PP/DOE should provide the detail information on: (i) waste heat consumed and vented to the atmosphere by each clinker production line; and (ii) specific fuel consumption of each clinker production line per unit output of clinker. Further the DOE shall substantiate the correlation between the available waste heat and maximum possible power output by each clinker production line. 6. The monitoring plan shall include monitoring of Oxidation ratio of fuel used in Clinker Production and waste heat used within cement work in each clinker production line in accordance with the AM0024 v2.1.
Date	12 May 10