Issuance Request for Review Form


CDM project activity/programme of activities
issuance request review form (CDM-ISSR-FORM)
(Version 03.0)

Project title of the project activity or programme of activities (PoA) for which issuance is requestedDemand side energy conservation and reduction measures at ITC Tribeni Unit (0745)
DOE that requested for issuance and date of requestDNV (10 Nov 09)
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 65 of the CDM modalities and procedures, for which reason(s) you request review
Incompetence
Please indicate reasons for the request for review
The DOE shall clarify how it verified:

1) The specifications of equipment replaced/retrofit for the newly implemented project measure “P26”, as well as the determination of the baseline consumption (488,059.09 kWh) as per the methodology and monitoring plan requirement, since the information is not presented in the documents;

2) The increased emission reductions for each of the relevant project measures as compared to the PDD estimate, considering that the overall emission reductions well exceed the PDD estimates (by about 8%) while several project measures have not claimed emission reductions during this period. Explanations shall be provided on the reasons for significantly increased energy savings for project measures such as F8B: the PDD estimates an annual saving of 75 000 kWh, whereas the actual savings reached 660 066 kWh;

3) The emission reductions achieved by each of the individual project measures such as TEM UT2, for which the baseline was established based on a full year's (12 months, or 365 days) annual consumption while in the project scenario, there were periods during which the project did not operate (less than one full year’s hours should be used), considering that the registered PDD stipulates that emission reductions shall be based on actual operating hours in the project;

4) A significant number of inconsistencies of the (annualised) baseline consumption between the monitoring report and the spreadsheet was noted, e.g. the CER spreadsheet reports 92 885.40 kWh for UT2 (Cell F5, worksheet MDS TEM UT2), whereas the monitoring report states 112,257.45 kWh (p.16). Clarification is required.
Date 29 Jan 10