CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	9006
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Installation of Top-Pressure Recovery Turbine at Blast Furnace -4
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1) The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of input values, in particular the escalation rate of O&M costs (4%) and the escalation rate of tariff (1.2% in average). Please refer to VVM version 1.2, paragraph 111 (a). 2) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has validated the appropriatness of using annex 1 of ACM0012 to assess the extent of use of waste energy from the waste energy generation facilities in the absence of the CDM project activity given the fact that there appears to have less tna five similar facilities without including the facilities with CDM projects. In doing so, please also be notified that option 1 is applicable only if at least five facilities are analysed to arrive at “reference facility” practice. Please refer to ACM0012 version 4, annex 1. 3) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has validated the appropriatenss of the identified baseline scenario given the fact that it is not clear whether the project paricipant has included all potential baseline alternatives while identifying the baseline scenaio, in particular, the internal grid of the facility that consists five power plants (CPP1, CPP2, CPP3, SBU I and SBU II). Please refer to VVM version 1.2, paragraph 84. 4) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has validated the appropriateness and conservertiveness of the electricity emission factor of the baseline scenario, given that: (a) the Greenfield 300MW coal based captive power plant (CPP4) has been identified as the baseline scenario of power generation, while the electricity emission factor of baseline scenario has been determined based on an internal grid that consists of five power plants (CPP1, CPP2, CPP3, SBU I and SBU II)). (b) It is not clear whether the internal grid is isolated or connected with the national or regional grid; and if it is connected, how the DOE has validated that the electricity generated by the project activity would not replace the electricity that would be imported from the national/regional grid. Please refer to VVM version 1.2, paragraph 91.
Date	14 Jun 13