08:59 01 Sep 24
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 9006 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | Installation of Top-Pressure Recovery Turbine at Blast Furnace -4 |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1) The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of input values, in particular the escalation rate of O&M costs (4%) and the escalation rate of tariff (1.2% in average). Please refer to VVM version 1.2, paragraph 111 (a). 2) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has validated the appropriatness of using annex 1 of ACM0012 to assess the extent of use of waste energy from the waste energy generation facilities in the absence of the CDM project activity given the fact that there appears to have less tna five similar facilities without including the facilities with CDM projects. In doing so, please also be notified that option 1 is applicable only if at least five facilities are analysed to arrive at “reference facility” practice. Please refer to ACM0012 version 4, annex 1. 3) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has validated the appropriatenss of the identified baseline scenario given the fact that it is not clear whether the project paricipant has included all potential baseline alternatives while identifying the baseline scenaio, in particular, the internal grid of the facility that consists five power plants (CPP1, CPP2, CPP3, SBU I and SBU II). Please refer to VVM version 1.2, paragraph 84. 4) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has validated the appropriateness and conservertiveness of the electricity emission factor of the baseline scenario, given that: (a) the Greenfield 300MW coal based captive power plant (CPP4) has been identified as the baseline scenario of power generation, while the electricity emission factor of baseline scenario has been determined based on an internal grid that consists of five power plants (CPP1, CPP2, CPP3, SBU I and SBU II)). (b) It is not clear whether the internal grid is isolated or connected with the national or regional grid; and if it is connected, how the DOE has validated that the electricity generated by the project activity would not replace the electricity that would be imported from the national/regional grid. Please refer to VVM version 1.2, paragraph 91. |
|
Date | 13 Jun 13 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: