CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	6869
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Gunung Megang Add-on Combined Cycle Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1) The DOE is requested to further explain how it has validated the following input values: (a) the total investment, in line with the EB62 Annex 5 paragraph 6. In doing so the DOE shall explain whether there was a change to the total investment in the revision of the proposal dated 27/03/2011 as compared to the initial EPC Proposal submitted in October 2010; (b) the tariff,  in line with the EB62 Annex 5 paragraph 6, as it is not clear whether the Appendix G of the new draft PPA for the CCGT was valid and applicable at the time of the investment decision on 24/11/2010; (c) the gas price, in particular how the DOE validated that the gas price of 5.2 USD/MMBTU (proposal from MEDCO dated 21/12/2010) was known to the PP prior to the investment decision. Furthermore, how the DOE validated the gas price of 5.2 USD/MMBTU is suitable in line with the VVS version 03.0 paragraph 120b, and the unlikelihood of the gas price being 4.68 USD/MMBTU in the sensitivity analysis, considering the reference /43/ of the Validation Report shows the gas price being in the range of 1.2 to 6 USD/MMBTU; (d) the hourly gas consumption by GT's project scenario being calculated using heat rate of Gas Turbine for the baseline scenario (9681 BTU/kWh, as per the document SD10a page 63/130) in line with the VVS version 03.0 paragraph 120a-c, considering for the purpose of calculating the component C of tariff, the heat rate of 8235 BTU/kWh is used; (e) the hourly gas consumption by GT's baseline scenario being calculated using heat rate from the document SD10a page 63/130 in line with the VVS version 03.0 paragraph 120a and 120b , while the historical figures of the heat rate is available. Please refer to EB62 Annex 5 paragraph 6, VVS version 03.0 paragraphs 120 (a), (b), (c) and (e)..
Date	01 Nov 13