CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	5469
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Switch from Single Cycle to Combined Cycle (CC) CDM Project at Shirvan Power Plant
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1) The DOE is requested to further substantiate the start date of the project activity in line with the Glossary of CDM terms, in particular why the date when the letter of credit was acquired was not considered as the start date. In doing so, DOE shall also explain in detail when the letter of credit was issued. Please refer to Glossary of CDM terms.. 2) The DOE needs to further explain how the methodology is applicable for the project activity as the framework agreement in 2002 indicates that the project was initially designed as combined cycle power plant whereas the methodology is for the conversion of single cycle to combined cycle power generation. In doing so, the DOE shall also explain what was revoked in the framework agreement and how it impacted the implementation of the project activity. Please refer to VVM version 01.2 paragraph 68.. 3) The DOE is required to further explain how the calculation of the grid emission factor has been validated, in particular why the calculation of the operating margin considers the low-cost/must-run power plants to be only nuclear, hydro and wind power plants, as per the Validation Report page 61, or only hydro and wind power plants as per the spreadsheet. In doing so, the DOE shall also justify why the other type of power plants such as gas power plants or diesel power plants are not considered as low-cost/must-run, in line with the tool (i.e. Low-cost/must-run resources are defined as power plants with low marginal generation costs or power plants that are dispatched independently of the daily or seasonal load of the grid). Please refer to Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system version 02 footnote 2.. 4) The DOE is required to further explain how it has validated parameters EGOC and FCHIST based on 3 years data only (2008, 2009 and 2010), given that the data for 2011 appear to be available (http://www2.tavanir.org.ir/info/stat89/tafsili/tolid/excel/vahedha.doc). Please refer to ACM0007 version 04 page 5 and 6..
Date	26 Feb 12