11:18 01 Sep 24
Registration Request for Review Form
CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0) |
---|
Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration | 2915 |
---|---|
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration | 340 MW Gas based combined cycle power project expansion at Hazira |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation. | |
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Additional information | |
1. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of the start date of the project activity as per the CDM glossary of terms, given that several contracts for fuel supply have been signed before the start date of the project activity. 2. The DOE shall further substantiate the suitability of the input values applied in the calculation of the levelized cost of electricity production of each plausible alternative in line with in accordance with paragraph 109 of VVM, in particular, total investment, annual O&M, O&M escalation, auxiliary consumption, rate of depreciation, tax on income, price of fuel, and custom duty on fuel. 3. The DOE shall confirm how the applicability of the methodology has been validated, in particular that the implementation of the project activity will not limit natural gas based power capacity additions in region. The detailed information on the existing and the projected gas supply, and demand balance in the region including the existing and projected consumption of gas-fired power plants should be provided. 4. The DOE shall further substantiate credibility of identified alternatives, in particular, how it has validated that the all plausible alternatives provide output comparable to the project activity in line with AM0029 v3, given that the project activity is a captive power plant. 5. Further clarification is required how the DOE has validated: (i) the calculation of energy efficiency of the technology (nBL) used in calculating baseline emission factor; (ii) and emission factor for upstream fugitive methane used in calculating leakage in accordance with AM0029 v3. 6. The project emission due to combustion of fuel shall be included in the monitoring plan as per AM0029 v3. |
|
Date | 28 Dec 09 |
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: