SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION | |
---|---|
Title and UNFCCC reference number of the project activity or programme of activities (PoA) |
9948: "Impact Carbon Global Safe Water Programme of Activities (PoA)" |
Titles and reference numbers of the component project activities (CPAs) covered by the request for issuance |
|
Date of the request for issuance | 2021/01/12 |
Monitoring period to which the request for issuance applies |
2020/01/01 - 2020/03/21 |
UNFCCC reference number of the request for issuance |
9948-MP4-IRP3 |
SECTION 2: BASIS FOR REVIEW REQUEST | |
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 65 of the CDM
modalities and procedures (the annex to decision 3/CMP.1), the issues regarding which you request for review. Please tick the applicable boxes. |
|
Incompetence
|
|
SECTION 3: COMMENTS SUPPORTING REVIEW REQUEST | |
Please elaborate the reason for requesting a review on the issues you indicated in section 2 above | |
1) Refer to paragraph: VVS-PoA, version 2, paragraph 340 (a) The baseline water source is not mentioned in the monitoring report or emission reduction sheet. The included CPA-DDs (Section A.3) and the monitoring report (Section C.1) indicate that UltraFlo WPS will be fixed and applicable for piped water while UltraTab WPS is portable in nature and applicable for un-piped water. However, it is not clear from verification report how the DOE confirmed whether the implementation of the WPS is in accordance with the description provided in the included CPA-DDs and whether the installed WPS is compatible with the available water source. Therefore, the DOE shall verify how it determined that the WPS is implemented in accordance with description contained in the included CPA-DDs and the installed WPS is compatible with the available water source.
2) Refer to paragraph: Paragraph 15 of AMS-III.AV version 4 and VVS-PoA, version 2, paragraph 344 The DOE shall further substantiate how it has verified the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology, in particular the monitoring frequency of parameter “operational units”, since the CPA-DDs states that the monitoring frequency for the parameter as “At least once per verification or biennially as per the monitoring requirements in the methodology”, which could lead to possibilities whereby the monitoring frequency not meeting methodology requirement (i.e. at least once every two years) when the verification / monitoring period is conducted with a time gap of more than two years.
3) Refer to paragraph: VVS-PoA ver. 02 Paragraph 304 (c) The DOE cross-verified continuous availability of safe drinking water based on the interviews with the users and delivery notes, and further confirmed that the subsequent supplies are reported in the emission reduction spreadsheet. However, it is observed in the emission reduction spreadsheet that:
Taking into account the above, the DOE is requested to;
4) Refer to paragraph: VVS-PoA, version 2, paragraph 359 (d) The DOE shall further substantiate how it has verified the appropriateness of applying the entire days covered by the monitoring period when calculating parameter QPWy (i.e. quantity of purified water for drinking during the year y), given the facts that the systems do not service the entire population (i.e. the students) during the school holidays. Further, the DOE should also check following clarifications issued by the Meth Panel in this regard. SSC_795: https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/clarifications/05721 SSC_792: https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/clarifications/57226
|
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: