Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to describe the GHG sources with in the project boundary in the PDD as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PDD (page 10) and the validation report (page 16) indicate that baseline emissions of CH4 from uncontrolled burning or decay of surplus biomass and project emissions of CH4 from combustion of biomass residues for electricity and heat are excluded for simplification. This is not consistent with the ex-ante calculation of Emission Reductions provided in page 49, which accounts 6,461.7 tCO2e from the anearobic decay of biomass residues (BEbr,y) and 1,840.57 tCO2e from the combustion of biomass residues (PEbr,y). Further, the validation report does not contain information on how the DOE assessed the equations applied to calculate the baseline emissions due to uncontrolled burning or decay of biomass residues (BEbr,y) and project emissions from the combustion of biomass residues (PEbr,y), as per as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92.

2: The PP/DOE are requested to list the data and parameters used to calculate the emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PDD states that the combined margin (CM) emission factor is calculated according to data published by the DNA. Please indicate if parameter EFgrid,CM should be included in Section B.6.2 of the PDD (Data and parameters that are available at validation).

3: The PP/DOE are requested to list all the data and parameters to be monitored in line with applied methodology as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PDD, section B.7.1 contains monitoring parameter EFkm,y with two different values (EFkm,y = 0.001011 tCO2/km on page 52 and EFkm,y = 0.001097 tCO2/km on page 56). Please clarify.