Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The saving of 136.05 GWhth/y is calculated based parameter EGPJ,m,y which uses the average historical figures. The DOE needs to further explain that the ex-ante figure of EGPJ,m,y is reasonable in accordance with the VVM version 01.2 paragraph 91, taking into account the capacity and the plant load factor of the gas turbines. Furthermore, the capacity of the gas turbine has not been mentioned.

2: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
(a) The DOE accepted the calculation of parameters EFBL,n,CO2 and EFPJ,n,CO2 based only on natural gas emission factor as it is in line with AM_CLA_0173 (VR page 21-22). However, the DOE is requested to further explain: (i) how the approach is appropriate to calculate EFPJ,n,CO2 considering there will be two types of fuel combusted in the project scenario (natural gas and distillate fuel oil); (ii) how the clarification AM_CLA_0173 provided for methodology ACM0013 is applicable for project applying methodology AMS-II.B.
(b) In light of clarification CLA SSC_136 on the applied methodology, the DOE is requested to validate how the fuel mix ratio in the project scenario would not change as compared to the ratio in the historical figure, and how any change in the fuel mix ratio would not contribute to the actual emission reduction.