05:21 22 Dec 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The DOE shall provide validation opinion on how the project activity is in compliance with the applicability condition 8 of the methodology. In doing so, the DOE shall confirm that directly measuring the energy use/output of the project activity is ensured.
2: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
In doing so, the DOE shall provide validation opinion on why the gas supply contract signed on 26 September 2006 or the construction license issued in January 2007 has not been considered as the project starting date.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 62 Annex 13 paragraph 8 b.
In doing so, the DOE shall provide validation opinion on all evidences listed on page 22 of the PDD, in particular the meeting with the CDM consulting company on 23 January 2008, the CDM consulting contract signed on 15 September 2008, and the quotations received from DOEs.
4: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
The DOE shall provide validation opinion on how the monitoring plan is in compliance with the methodology which requires to monitor the output of element process i (Qpj).
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The DOE shall provide validation opinion on how the project activity is in compliance with the applicability condition 8 of the methodology. In doing so, the DOE shall confirm that directly measuring the energy use/output of the project activity is ensured.
2: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
In doing so, the DOE shall provide validation opinion on why the gas supply contract signed on 26 September 2006 or the construction license issued in January 2007 has not been considered as the project starting date.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 62 Annex 13 paragraph 8 b.
In doing so, the DOE shall provide validation opinion on all evidences listed on page 22 of the PDD, in particular the meeting with the CDM consulting company on 23 January 2008, the CDM consulting contract signed on 15 September 2008, and the quotations received from DOEs.
4: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
The DOE shall provide validation opinion on how the monitoring plan is in compliance with the methodology which requires to monitor the output of element process i (Qpj).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: