21:12 04 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to indicate the reference and the versions of the applied methodology in the PDD as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE shall use the valid version of “Emissions from solid waste disposal sites” at the submission of registration request. “Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site (version 05.1.0)”, requested registration can be submitted on 25/07/2012. However, the PP/DOE submitted registration request on 11/10/2012. The valid version of “Emissions from solid waste disposal sites” (version 6.0.0 or version 6.0.1) will affect the baseline emission calculation due to the value applied in the formula of BE calculation is changed compared to old version.
In the formula of BE_SWDS calculation, the factor Phi Φ- Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties" is 0.9 in the version 5.1 of the tool, while in the version (6.0.0 or 6.0.1), the factor is taken as 0.75. Based on this, the ER will reduce from 21,732tCO2e/yr to 19,191tCO2e/yr.
2: The DOE is requested to state if all the documents/data used in the PDD for the emission reduction calculations are correctly quoted and interpreted in the PDD as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(b).
On page 17 of PDD and page 42 of VR, the Net electricity supplied is calculated as the difference between Gross electricity (15,300MWh) and Internal consumption (7,500MWh), based on the calculation, the net electricity supplied to the grid is 7,800MWh, not 7,830MWh used in the PDD for ex ante calculation. The PP/DOE shall address such inconsistency.
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
The DOE shall provide information on how it has validated the variation of annual O&M cost to reach the benchmark in the sensitivity analysis. he DOE shall provide information how it has validated the variation of annual O&M cost to reach the benchmark in the sensitivity analysis. The PDD states the IRR could reach the benchmark when annual O&M cost is increased by 19.5%, while in the VR, the DOE states that "even annual O&M cost is dereased by 100%, the IRR will not reach the benchmark". The DOE shall address this inconsistency.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to indicate the reference and the versions of the applied methodology in the PDD as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE shall use the valid version of “Emissions from solid waste disposal sites” at the submission of registration request. “Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site (version 05.1.0)”, requested registration can be submitted on 25/07/2012. However, the PP/DOE submitted registration request on 11/10/2012. The valid version of “Emissions from solid waste disposal sites” (version 6.0.0 or version 6.0.1) will affect the baseline emission calculation due to the value applied in the formula of BE calculation is changed compared to old version.
In the formula of BE_SWDS calculation, the factor Phi Φ- Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties" is 0.9 in the version 5.1 of the tool, while in the version (6.0.0 or 6.0.1), the factor is taken as 0.75. Based on this, the ER will reduce from 21,732tCO2e/yr to 19,191tCO2e/yr.
2: The DOE is requested to state if all the documents/data used in the PDD for the emission reduction calculations are correctly quoted and interpreted in the PDD as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(b).
On page 17 of PDD and page 42 of VR, the Net electricity supplied is calculated as the difference between Gross electricity (15,300MWh) and Internal consumption (7,500MWh), based on the calculation, the net electricity supplied to the grid is 7,800MWh, not 7,830MWh used in the PDD for ex ante calculation. The PP/DOE shall address such inconsistency.
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
The DOE shall provide information on how it has validated the variation of annual O&M cost to reach the benchmark in the sensitivity analysis. he DOE shall provide information how it has validated the variation of annual O&M cost to reach the benchmark in the sensitivity analysis. The PDD states the IRR could reach the benchmark when annual O&M cost is increased by 19.5%, while in the VR, the DOE states that "even annual O&M cost is dereased by 100%, the IRR will not reach the benchmark". The DOE shall address this inconsistency.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: