09:24 28 Dec 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE should transparently report the value assumed for the ex-ante grid emission factor and explain how such factor was determined in line with the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” (including the data vintage used, methodological choices, etc)
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, the DOE shall provide a further validation opinion on the total Investment, loan Interest during construction period, long term loan, equity debt ratio, main equipment value and deductible VAT for main equipment.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the existence of the similar projects for common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (b).
In doing so the DOE shall: a) clearly report the sources of evidence used to confirm the common practice analysis, b) provide the list of similar activities identified (including names and characteristics), and c) further explain why projects with installed capacity of less than 15MW were excluded from the analysis in line with the additionality tool.
1: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE should transparently report the value assumed for the ex-ante grid emission factor and explain how such factor was determined in line with the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” (including the data vintage used, methodological choices, etc)
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, the DOE shall provide a further validation opinion on the total Investment, loan Interest during construction period, long term loan, equity debt ratio, main equipment value and deductible VAT for main equipment.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the existence of the similar projects for common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (b).
In doing so the DOE shall: a) clearly report the sources of evidence used to confirm the common practice analysis, b) provide the list of similar activities identified (including names and characteristics), and c) further explain why projects with installed capacity of less than 15MW were excluded from the analysis in line with the additionality tool.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: