Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PDD does not list/discuss the relevant assumptions and references for the data used to conduct the investment analysis. The discount rate used is neither listed nor are the assumptions and references discussed in the PDD.

2: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE is requested to provide a statement on whether the data and parameters fixed ex-ante are conservative and appropriate.

3: The DOE is requested to state that the estimates in the PDD are reasonable for data and parameters that are monitored during implementation and are available after validation as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE is requested to provide a validation opinion hat the estimates in the PDD are reasonable for data and parameters that are monitored during implementation and are available after validation.

4: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
It is not clear how the DOE has validated the information provided in the PDD (p.24-25) on how the CDM would alleviate the barriers that prevent the project activity from occurring in the absence of the CDM.

5: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121.
The DOE has not provided a validation opinion on the common practice analysis indicated in the PDD (pp. 27-28) as step 4 in the baseline scenario identification and additionality assessment.