13:58 22 Nov 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of each parameter listed as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of all the ex-ante parameters in section B.6.2 of the PDD.
2: The PP/DOE are requested to describe in detail the calculation of ex-ante emission reductions ( with actual data and equations) as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE are requested to revise the inconsistencies related to the value of the grid emission factor used in the PDD, given that a value of 0.602 tCO2/MWh is mentioned on page 30 of the PDD; whereas the value validated by the DOE is 0.5764 tCO2/MW.
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, the DOE should provide a validation opinion on the suitability of the Insurance, the Interest rate on term loan and the Enterprise Income Tax.
4: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
In doing so, the DOE should provide information on why the variations in the key parameters that would make the IRR reach the benchmark are not likely to occur.
5: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the existence of the similar projects for common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (b).
In doing so, the DOE should further explain why similar activities with installed capacity of less that 15MW were excluded from the analysis.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of each parameter listed as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of all the ex-ante parameters in section B.6.2 of the PDD.
2: The PP/DOE are requested to describe in detail the calculation of ex-ante emission reductions ( with actual data and equations) as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE are requested to revise the inconsistencies related to the value of the grid emission factor used in the PDD, given that a value of 0.602 tCO2/MWh is mentioned on page 30 of the PDD; whereas the value validated by the DOE is 0.5764 tCO2/MW.
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, the DOE should provide a validation opinion on the suitability of the Insurance, the Interest rate on term loan and the Enterprise Income Tax.
4: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
In doing so, the DOE should provide information on why the variations in the key parameters that would make the IRR reach the benchmark are not likely to occur.
5: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the existence of the similar projects for common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (b).
In doing so, the DOE should further explain why similar activities with installed capacity of less that 15MW were excluded from the analysis.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: