11:53 14 Nov 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
The DOE is requested to further validate the suitability of the tariff selected for the proposed project activity given that a similar project (ì.e. UNFCCC Reg no. 5339) applies a tariff (0.75 RMB/kWh) which is higher than the value used in this project activity.
2: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated the scope of the common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (a).
The DOE is requested to clarify the inconsistency of the geographical boundary mentioned in the validation report given that page 27 states Shanxi Province as the geographical area selected for common practice where as page 28 of the VR and PDD states Tianjin city.
1: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
The DOE is requested to further validate the suitability of the tariff selected for the proposed project activity given that a similar project (ì.e. UNFCCC Reg no. 5339) applies a tariff (0.75 RMB/kWh) which is higher than the value used in this project activity.
2: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated the scope of the common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (a).
The DOE is requested to clarify the inconsistency of the geographical boundary mentioned in the validation report given that page 27 states Shanxi Province as the geographical area selected for common practice where as page 28 of the VR and PDD states Tianjin city.

Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: