Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 87.
The DOE is requested to clarify how it has validated the most plausible baseline scenario in line with the requirement of para 3 of AMS III Z version 03 which states that "New facilities (Greenfield projects) and project activities involving capacity additions compared to the baseline scenario are only eligible if they comply with the related and relevant requirements in the General Guidance for SSC methodologies."

2: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE is requested to validate the default factors used in the calculation of annual production specific emission factor (EFBL) such as net calorific value of coal (NCV,j), emission factor of coal (EF,CO2,j) and density of brick (d).

3: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The DOE is requested to clarify the prior consideration of the CDM for the proposed project activity in accordance with para 2 of EB 62 Annex 13, given that it has not confirmed that the project participant has informed the Host Party DNA (India) of the commencement of the project activity and of their intention to seek CDM status.

4: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
The DOE is requested to provide further validation opinion on the prevailing practice barrier as described in the PDD in line with 117 (a) and (b) of VVM version 1.2.