21:52 14 Jun 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all the data and parameters to be monitored in line with applied methodology as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
In particular, the PDD does not include the monitoring of NCV and density of diesel as required by the paragraph 15 (f) of AMS III Z version 03.
2: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
The DOE is requested to clarify that whether the start date of the project activity is the earliest of the date of establishment among all the 42 FaL-G plants or the earliest date of commencement of production among all the 42 FaL-G units (as explained in section 4.6.1 of the validation report, page 18). In doing so, please confirm the start date of the project activity mentioned on page 26 and 68 (Annex 7) of the PDD.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 62 Annex 13 paragraph 8 b.
In particular, the DOE is requested to clarify that how it has validated the real and continuing actions listed in the PDD in line with paragraph 7 of EB 62 Annex 13. In doing so, please clarify:
1. the means of validation of the event "submission of the PDD dated 24 March 2008 for Bundle III for validation, using AMS-II.D in convention to the earlier project, Bundle I that was duly registered and;
2. whether the event "Request for deviation submitted by DNV on 16 December 2008 (M-DEV0219) that was approved at the EB48 in 11 March 2009" is specific to the proposed project activity.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all the data and parameters to be monitored in line with applied methodology as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
In particular, the PDD does not include the monitoring of NCV and density of diesel as required by the paragraph 15 (f) of AMS III Z version 03.
2: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
The DOE is requested to clarify that whether the start date of the project activity is the earliest of the date of establishment among all the 42 FaL-G plants or the earliest date of commencement of production among all the 42 FaL-G units (as explained in section 4.6.1 of the validation report, page 18). In doing so, please confirm the start date of the project activity mentioned on page 26 and 68 (Annex 7) of the PDD.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 62 Annex 13 paragraph 8 b.
In particular, the DOE is requested to clarify that how it has validated the real and continuing actions listed in the PDD in line with paragraph 7 of EB 62 Annex 13. In doing so, please clarify:
1. the means of validation of the event "submission of the PDD dated 24 March 2008 for Bundle III for validation, using AMS-II.D in convention to the earlier project, Bundle I that was duly registered and;
2. whether the event "Request for deviation submitted by DNV on 16 December 2008 (M-DEV0219) that was approved at the EB48 in 11 March 2009" is specific to the proposed project activity.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: