Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 87.
In particular, the DOE is requested to explain how it validated that the identified baseline scenario (W2,P10) is suitable for both existing and greenfield facilities. In particular, the how scenario W2 is an adequate baseline scenario for greenfield facilities.

2: The DOE is requested to describe the steps taken to assess the equations applied to calculate the baseline/ project emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per the chosen methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92.
The DOE is requested to explain how it validated the suitability of the algorithms and formulae used to calculate baseline emissions for line 2, given that it is a greenfield facility and, as per ACM 0012 version 4, the calculation of baseline emissions should be adjusted as per Annex 1.

In doing this, the DOE should explain how it validated the calculation of the parameter fpractice

3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, the DOE is requested to explain how it validated (i) the annual output of 90% during the first year of operation and (ii) the annual operational hours of the WHR system of 7,200 h/y while the cement plant is expected to operate during 7,440 h/y.


4: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the existence of the similar projects for common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (b).


5: The DOE is requested to provide information on how the distinctive differences between the project activity and the similar projects identified in the selected scope are justified as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (c).


6: The DOE is requested to describe how it assessed the adequacy of the local stakeholder consultation as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 129 (b) and (c)