Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to include description of the process taken to validate the accuracy and completeness of the project description in VR as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 64(a).
The DOE shall explain how it has validated that the furnace off-gas used by the Sinter Plant in the pre-project scenario would remain the same after the project implementation and would not diverted to the project activity for electricity generation.

2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The DOE shall explain how it has validated that:
(a) the waste gas/heat recovery project is or is not implemented in a single-cycle power plant (e.g. gas turbine or diesel generator) to generate power;
(b) the remaining lifetime of the waste energy generation equipment; and
(c) the extent of use of waste energy from the waste energy generation facilities in the absence of the CDM project activity in accordance with Annex 2 of ACM0012 version 4.
Please refer to page 4 of ACM0012 version.

3: The DOE is requested to state if the methodology provides different options for equations and parameters and if the selection is appropriate as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 90.
With regard to the determination of fcap, the DOE shall explain how it has validated that:
(a) method-1 is not applicable given that the furnace operational data from 2007 to May 2011is available as described in the PDD (e.g. page 8);
(b) method-2 is not applicable given that the quantity of waste gas used for electricity generation is feasible to be measured and will be monitored (page 48 of the PDD).
In doing so, please also explain how it has validated the quantity of waste energy released or generated prior to the start of the project activity, as required by the selected method in determining the fcap.

4: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE shall explain how it has validated that all data sources and assumptions are appropriate and calculations are correct, and result in conservative ex-ante grid emission factors (OM and BM). In doing so, please also provide the spreadsheet of the grid emission factors.

5: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
The DOE shall specify the barriers of the project activity, in particular explain whether the project activity is first of its kind, or facing technology barrier or barrier due to the prevailing practice, given that the barriers explained in the validation report are not consistent with the barriers described in the PDD. In addition, the DOE specify what evidences and public information have been checked in validating the identified barriers.

6: Please resubmit the project activity using the latest applicable guidance and standards at the time of resubmission.