03:21 26 Apr 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all the PDD sections for the description of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
(1). It is not clear whether the waste heat of the proposed project activity is implemented at a new facility (page 49 of validation report) or an existing facility. If the project activity is implemented at an existing facility, please provide the information regarding the operation start date of the facility (CS2 plant).
(2). Please provide information (both the scenario prior to the start date of the project activity and scenario after the capacity expansion of CS2 plant) on : (i) the total energy demand of the industry facility and specific energy consumption of the CS2 production; (ii) the quantity and energy content of the waste energy produced for the rated plant capacity/per unit of product produced, please also provide the energy balance of relevant sections of the CS2 plant; and (iii) use of the waste heat to meet the internal energy demand of CS2 plant.
(3). Please also provide the information regarding the steam-driven blower, including the operation start date of the steam-driven blower, the source of the steam used for the blower, quantity and energy content of the steam used.
(4). It is not clear whether the temperature and pressure of the waste heat steam remains stable prior to and during the implementation of the project activity. Please provide the information regarding the temperature and pressure of the steam.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The DOE shall further explain how it has validated the the waste heat utilization in absence of the project activity as per paragraph 6(g) of AMS III.Q version 3. Please provide quantified information regarding the records of waste excess steam released to atmosphere and the energy bills prior to the start of the project activity.
3: The DOE is requested to state if the methodology provides different options for equations and parameters and if the selection is appropriate as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 90.
Please further explain the validation of the capping of the baseline emission, in particular why method-2 is selected to determine the fcap and why method-1 is not applicable.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all the PDD sections for the description of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
(1). It is not clear whether the waste heat of the proposed project activity is implemented at a new facility (page 49 of validation report) or an existing facility. If the project activity is implemented at an existing facility, please provide the information regarding the operation start date of the facility (CS2 plant).
(2). Please provide information (both the scenario prior to the start date of the project activity and scenario after the capacity expansion of CS2 plant) on : (i) the total energy demand of the industry facility and specific energy consumption of the CS2 production; (ii) the quantity and energy content of the waste energy produced for the rated plant capacity/per unit of product produced, please also provide the energy balance of relevant sections of the CS2 plant; and (iii) use of the waste heat to meet the internal energy demand of CS2 plant.
(3). Please also provide the information regarding the steam-driven blower, including the operation start date of the steam-driven blower, the source of the steam used for the blower, quantity and energy content of the steam used.
(4). It is not clear whether the temperature and pressure of the waste heat steam remains stable prior to and during the implementation of the project activity. Please provide the information regarding the temperature and pressure of the steam.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The DOE shall further explain how it has validated the the waste heat utilization in absence of the project activity as per paragraph 6(g) of AMS III.Q version 3. Please provide quantified information regarding the records of waste excess steam released to atmosphere and the energy bills prior to the start of the project activity.
3: The DOE is requested to state if the methodology provides different options for equations and parameters and if the selection is appropriate as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 90.
Please further explain the validation of the capping of the baseline emission, in particular why method-2 is selected to determine the fcap and why method-1 is not applicable.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: