18:31 22 May 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to verify the justification of the data used for the ex-ante emission reduction calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 98, 99 (a) (b) (c) and 100.
The PDD (page 19 and 26) and the validation report (page 39 and 116) state that the efficiency of the baseline cogeneration unit has been taken as 82% based on the pre-feasibility note and a letter from the manufacturer dated 12/04/2012. However, page 34 of the validation report states that “Efficiency of the baseline cogeneration unit is determined in line with para 28 of AMS.I.C/version 19 as the total annual energy produced over the last three years using the historical data as prescribed in paragraph 17”. The DOE is requested to clarify how it has validated the determination of the efficiency of the baseline cogeneration unit in line with the methodology, given that the project activity is defined as a greenfield project (page 10 of PDD and page 107 of the validation report). Please refer to VVS v02 para 98, 99 (a), (b), (c) and 100.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology(ies) as per VVS version 2 paragraph 132 (a).
The validation report has listed the parameter “Operating hours of co-generation plant i.e. boiler, TG set (Hrs/annum)” as monitored parameter, whereas this parameter is not listed as a monitored parameter in the PDD. Please refer to VVS v02 para 132 (a).
1: The DOE is requested to verify the justification of the data used for the ex-ante emission reduction calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 98, 99 (a) (b) (c) and 100.
The PDD (page 19 and 26) and the validation report (page 39 and 116) state that the efficiency of the baseline cogeneration unit has been taken as 82% based on the pre-feasibility note and a letter from the manufacturer dated 12/04/2012. However, page 34 of the validation report states that “Efficiency of the baseline cogeneration unit is determined in line with para 28 of AMS.I.C/version 19 as the total annual energy produced over the last three years using the historical data as prescribed in paragraph 17”. The DOE is requested to clarify how it has validated the determination of the efficiency of the baseline cogeneration unit in line with the methodology, given that the project activity is defined as a greenfield project (page 10 of PDD and page 107 of the validation report). Please refer to VVS v02 para 98, 99 (a), (b), (c) and 100.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology(ies) as per VVS version 2 paragraph 132 (a).
The validation report has listed the parameter “Operating hours of co-generation plant i.e. boiler, TG set (Hrs/annum)” as monitored parameter, whereas this parameter is not listed as a monitored parameter in the PDD. Please refer to VVS v02 para 132 (a).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: