04:21 05 Nov 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to explain the methodological choices for the calculation of the baseline, project emissions and emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
1. On page 28 of the PDD it is stated that the boundary of the baseline is only the covered first anaerobic lagoon. The remaining lagoon system is not integrated in the baseline emission calculations and therefore also not in the project activity emissions. On page 26 of the PDD it is stated that "COD removal efficiency (ηCOD,BL,i) of the baseline system has been established based on a measurement campaign of at least 10 days. COD inflow was measured from the samples collected from influent entering into first anaerobic pond (i.e. Lagoon 1) and COD outflow was measured from the samples collected from effluent exit from Lagoon 1." Contrary information is available on page 34 of the PDD, which states that samples of wastewater entering first anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 1) and exiting the third anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 3) were collected to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and DOE has not stated in the validation report as to what were the samplings points to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system.
2. On page 17 of the PDD it is stated that "according to the methodology only the first anaerobic pond has met the definition of anaerobic pond under the methodology". In section A.2 and B.3 of the PDD and in the validation report it is stated that the first three lagoons 1, 2 and 3 are operating under anaerobic conditions. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and validation report.
2: The DOE is requested to state if the baseline methodology is correctly applied to calculate project/baseline emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(d).
1. On page 28 of the PDD it is stated that the boundary of the baseline is only the covered first anaerobic lagoon. The remaining lagoon system is not integrated in the baseline emission calculations and therefore also not in the project activity emissions. On page 26 of the PDD it is stated that "COD removal efficiency (ηCOD,BL,i) of the baseline system has been established based on a measurement campaign of at least 10 days. COD inflow was measured from the samples collected from influent entering into first anaerobic pond (i.e. Lagoon 1) and COD outflow was measured from the samples collected from effluent exit from Lagoon 1." Contrary information is available on page 34 of the PDD, which states that samples of wastewater entering first anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 1) and exiting the third anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 3) were collected to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and DOE has not stated in the validation report as to what were the samplings points to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system.
2. On page 17 of the PDD it is stated that "according to the methodology only the first anaerobic pond has met the definition of anaerobic pond under the methodology". In section A.2 and B.3 of the PDD and in the validation report it is stated that the first three lagoons 1, 2 and 3 are operating under anaerobic conditions. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and validation report.
3: The DOE is requested to state if the methodology provides different options for equations and parameters and if the selection is appropriate as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 90.
On page 28 of the PDD it is stated that the boundary of the baseline is only the covered first anaerobic lagoon. The remaining lagoon system is not integrated in the baseline emission calculations and therefore also not in the project activity emissions. Whereas on page 34 of the PDD it is stated that samples of wastewater entering first anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 1) and exiting the third anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 3) were collected to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system. Information in the PDD is not consistent to explain if lagoons 2 and lagoon 3 have been integrated in the baseline emission calculations. As per the requirement of paragraph 16 of AMS III.H, version 16, the validation report does not discuss as to, which sections of baseline treatment system are affected by implementation of the project activity and which are not affected. Further DOE has not confirmed in the validation report that emissions from sections affected by the project are accounted for in the baseline and project emission calculations.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to explain the methodological choices for the calculation of the baseline, project emissions and emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
1. On page 28 of the PDD it is stated that the boundary of the baseline is only the covered first anaerobic lagoon. The remaining lagoon system is not integrated in the baseline emission calculations and therefore also not in the project activity emissions. On page 26 of the PDD it is stated that "COD removal efficiency (ηCOD,BL,i) of the baseline system has been established based on a measurement campaign of at least 10 days. COD inflow was measured from the samples collected from influent entering into first anaerobic pond (i.e. Lagoon 1) and COD outflow was measured from the samples collected from effluent exit from Lagoon 1." Contrary information is available on page 34 of the PDD, which states that samples of wastewater entering first anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 1) and exiting the third anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 3) were collected to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and DOE has not stated in the validation report as to what were the samplings points to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system.
2. On page 17 of the PDD it is stated that "according to the methodology only the first anaerobic pond has met the definition of anaerobic pond under the methodology". In section A.2 and B.3 of the PDD and in the validation report it is stated that the first three lagoons 1, 2 and 3 are operating under anaerobic conditions. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and validation report.
2: The DOE is requested to state if the baseline methodology is correctly applied to calculate project/baseline emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(d).
1. On page 28 of the PDD it is stated that the boundary of the baseline is only the covered first anaerobic lagoon. The remaining lagoon system is not integrated in the baseline emission calculations and therefore also not in the project activity emissions. On page 26 of the PDD it is stated that "COD removal efficiency (ηCOD,BL,i) of the baseline system has been established based on a measurement campaign of at least 10 days. COD inflow was measured from the samples collected from influent entering into first anaerobic pond (i.e. Lagoon 1) and COD outflow was measured from the samples collected from effluent exit from Lagoon 1." Contrary information is available on page 34 of the PDD, which states that samples of wastewater entering first anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 1) and exiting the third anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 3) were collected to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and DOE has not stated in the validation report as to what were the samplings points to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system.
2. On page 17 of the PDD it is stated that "according to the methodology only the first anaerobic pond has met the definition of anaerobic pond under the methodology". In section A.2 and B.3 of the PDD and in the validation report it is stated that the first three lagoons 1, 2 and 3 are operating under anaerobic conditions. Consistent information is not available in the PDD and validation report.
3: The DOE is requested to state if the methodology provides different options for equations and parameters and if the selection is appropriate as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 90.
On page 28 of the PDD it is stated that the boundary of the baseline is only the covered first anaerobic lagoon. The remaining lagoon system is not integrated in the baseline emission calculations and therefore also not in the project activity emissions. Whereas on page 34 of the PDD it is stated that samples of wastewater entering first anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 1) and exiting the third anaerobic lagoon (Lagoon 3) were collected to determine the COD removal efficiency of baseline system. Information in the PDD is not consistent to explain if lagoons 2 and lagoon 3 have been integrated in the baseline emission calculations. As per the requirement of paragraph 16 of AMS III.H, version 16, the validation report does not discuss as to, which sections of baseline treatment system are affected by implementation of the project activity and which are not affected. Further DOE has not confirmed in the validation report that emissions from sections affected by the project are accounted for in the baseline and project emission calculations.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: